News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Channels in Common Lisp. Parent comment

Re:Channels in Common Lisp by reikonomusha on Friday January 20, 2017 @02:59AM (#13442328)
You are maintaining the API boundary between your application and your dependencies. I certainly do not maintain (in the most common sense of the word) my operating system source code, my compiler source code, my server source code, etc.

I have no problem with micro-libraries. In fact, I developed on the notion of the micro-est of libraries: a library generator that gets down to function-level dependencies [0].

[0] http://web.archive.org/web/20140711172208/http://symbo1ics.c...

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Channels in Common Lisp by TeMPOraL on Friday January 20, 2017 @05:04AM (#13442698)
> my operating system source code, my compiler source code, my server source code, etc.

Actually, you sort of do. You may not know it yet, if you were fortunate enough to never hit a problem with an update to one of them.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Channels in Common Lisp by taeric on Friday January 20, 2017 @11:54AM (#13445074)
Exactly. And I wasn't trying to be anti micro services or libraries. Just pointing out that confirmation bias is a big reason some folks are against them.

It is amplified when folks push them with no caveats. Some of us remember being burned in ways this allowed.

[ Parent | on HN ]