I'm thinking there must be a reason they do not mention F*, Coq, Agda, and Idris, perhaps because they are proof assistants[2] rather than automatic provers of programs with formal specifications. See also Isabelle and others. Regarding Idris (which you mention but is not on that page) and Epigram (which is noteworthy and again not on that page), neither are production ready and the latter is unmaintained.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whiley_(programming_language)#...
The ones they do mention are all imperative languages with added deductive verification in a Hoare calculus style (think loop invariants). The ones you mention are functional languages with a different style of proof (think inductive proofs).
Of course there are overlaps between the two styles (notably in Why3), but there are pronounced differences between them.
You might be thinking of JML (Java Modeling Language): http://www.eecs.ucf.edu/~leavens/JML//index.shtml Apparently JML-annotated programs can passed to Why3 using a confusingly documented set of tools: http://krakatoa.lri.fr/
There is also the Cheker Framework for Java: http://types.cs.washington.edu/checker-framework/ But as far as I understand it's less general than all the other tools you mention.
Also, some languages have been extended to support it: LiquidHaskell, Frama-C, and Spark/Ada. I also recall some Java extension but can't find it atm.
[1] https://www.reddit.com/r/ProgrammingLanguages/comments/4ref8...