Introducing ProtonMail's Tor hidden service

Re:Introducing ProtonMail's Tor hidden service by nanch on Thursday January 19, 2017 @05:01PM (#13439855)

What are good alternatives for communicating with somebody then?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Introducing ProtonMail's Tor hidden service by tptacek on Thursday January 19, 2017 @05:13PM (#13439933)

A secure messenger like Signal.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Introducing ProtonMail's Tor hidden service by carterehsmith on Thursday January 19, 2017 @09:54PM (#13441443)

Uhhhh.

Sure, use Signal, and Tor, and others -- if you want your communication to be preferentially screened by every single three-letter agency.

BTW this is not to disparage any four-letter agencies, eg. GCHQ. They do awesome work, which I do appreciate very much.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Introducing ProtonMail's Tor hidden service by brewdad on Thursday January 19, 2017 @11:58PM (#13441820)

I hope they enjoy reading my wife and I discussing dinner plans and my reminders to my son to do his homework.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Introducing ProtonMail's Tor hidden service by carterehsmith on Friday January 20, 2017 @10:15PM (#13448563)

Not sure what you are trying to achieve here. Do you want to stick it to the Man?

The software that is processing your communications will spend extra 0.01 seconds analyzing the data. Is that some kind of victory for you or something?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Introducing ProtonMail's Tor hidden service by riprowan on Friday January 20, 2017 @05:35AM (#13442796)

I started to make a witty post implying that you just signalled for some sort of terrorist attack using an encoded message, then I checked the calendar and posted this instead.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Introducing ProtonMail's Tor hidden service by LeoPanthera on Thursday January 19, 2017 @05:16PM (#13439963)

I've been experimenting with Matrix.

[ Parent | on HN ]