News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Rust vs. Go by throwaway3111 on Wednesday January 18, 2017 @08:56PM (#13432311)
The syntax is nice, pattern matching, traits and generics are nice. The added value is a language with a better type system than Go in Go's space (web development). I don't want manual memory management or to have to care about regions, lifetimes or borrowing.
Re:Rust vs. Go by dbmikus on Thursday January 19, 2017 @12:46AM (#13433366)
We have pattern matching, traits, generics, etc. in Scala (and OCaml?) already. The syntax isn't the same, but draws from the same lineage. If you took away the memory management, I think Rust would be just another ML descendent and I don't know what the motivating feature for the language would be.

I could be off base. I haven't programmed in Rust. I've just skimmed through the documentation and little code projects written in it every once and a while.