News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:U.S. sues Oracle, alleges salary and hiring discrimination by explainthisth on Wednesday January 18, 2017 @07:15PM (#13431783)
This could be easily explained in a lot of ways. Here's an example that makes sense intuitively to me: popular conception of Oracle among Bay Area locals I know is that they are money-grubbing assholes (similar reputation to an investment bank or something). They may attract a set of applicants that will negotiate aggressively and only accept high salaries. I'm white and I can sure as hell say I wouldn't work at Oracle for market rate. This effect may be correlated with race due to the way ideas travel through social groups, and immigration status.

I think this is at least as plausible as "bias" to explain why white applicants would be hired less and paid more.

Re:U.S. sues Oracle, alleges salary and hiring discrimination by euyyn on Wednesday January 18, 2017 @08:31PM (#13432182)
If it's just "white males are more reluctant to work for us", then surely that would also show in them hiring more females and more non-whites than expected, as they are more willing to work for them? It's not as if you're either a white male, or you're Indian.
Re:U.S. sues Oracle, alleges salary and hiring discrimination by explainthisth on Wednesday January 18, 2017 @08:46PM (#13432272)
The evidence "group A was hired more than than group B, and the effect was statistically significant" doesn't imply we should find a significant effect when comparing any other set of groups A, B, ~A, C, C^B, etc.

It's generally hard to prove things with statistics without a randomized experiment.