News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:One Man’s Quest to Hack His Own Genes by hprotagonist on Wednesday January 18, 2017 @03:19PM (#13429924)
>Hanley says he did not secure the approval of the FDA before carrying out his experiment either. The agency requires companies to seek an authorization called an investigational new drug application, or IND, before administering any novel drug or gene therapy to people. “They said ‘You need an IND’ and I said, ‘No, I don’t,’” recalls Hanley, who traded e-mails with officials at the federal agency. He argued that self-experiments should be exempt, in part because they don’t pose any risk to the public.

Until you start modifying the germ line, of course.

Re:One Man’s Quest to Hack His Own Genes by x1798DE on Wednesday January 18, 2017 @05:49PM (#13431175)
Posing a risk to your potential immediate descendants hardly counts as "the public", and you probably don't want to start down the road of enforcing that people don't have the right to do things to themselves which have the risk of possibly being teratogenic as if it's a public health threat.
Re:One Man’s Quest to Hack His Own Genes by dekhn on Wednesday January 18, 2017 @05:17PM (#13430884)
I read the whole article and Hanley's comments in the comment section (boy, did he hate the author of the article). I think he's being incredibly naive and overly optimistic. I say that as somebody who's wanted to see gene therapy be successful for a long time (and who learned that solving this problem is far harder than electroporating your cells.