Re:Why Medical Advice Seems to Change So Frequently
by ploxiln on Wednesday January 18, 2017 @11:18AM
(#13427449)
She doesn't do statistical studies, no. But I think she has good sense of the relative confidence she can have in "new discoveries" and older institutional knowledge (which also isn't 100%). And sometimes she puts in more time and attention than a few previous doctors did, considering all the symptoms and previous attempted treatments, to come up with an accurate diagnosis and effective treatment. By not being dogmatic, and spending a bit more time, she can fix some things.
I don't usually "do science" the statistical way either, I usually come up with a plausible theory for a bug, fix it, and use the results to confirm or refute my theory of that one bug. Usually it's something dumb, simple, and obvious in hindsight, not a whole new algorithm or technique.
Re:Why Medical Advice Seems to Change So Frequently
by Fomite on Wednesday January 18, 2017 @02:38AM
(#13424769)
MDs are not the only ones doing medical research.
Re:Why Medical Advice Seems to Change So Frequently
by rscho on Wednesday January 18, 2017 @02:45AM
(#13424794)
That is indeed a valid point. Unfortunately, most of biology can also be qualified of "soft science".
I however expect that a new age is coming for medicine: the age of science (the real one, this time). We are already seeing the birth of sizable databases exploited by professional scientists, but this is still a very minor part of the research output, and the signal-to-noise ratio is currently dismal. Additionally, the progress of medicine is somewhat parallel to the progress of hard science. What is lacking the most, is solid data and the methods to collect them.
Re:Why Medical Advice Seems to Change So Frequently
by Fomite on Thursday January 19, 2017 @02:50AM
(#13433928)
Ironically enough though, "hard scientists" wandering into biology and medicine and going "Right, time to show you lot how real science is done..." are notorious for producing really awful research.
We could debate for hours on that subject, but I dare say that someone who believes that most M.Ds can do real science is very wrong. Statistics done by M.Ds is akin to a junkie cooking meth. He knows how to make it, but has no idea why sometimes it goes wrong. Moreover, you drastically underestimate the dishonesty of the "experts" you are citing.