Re:Closed-loop body weight control
by cardiffspaceman on Tuesday January 17, 2017 @07:13PM
(#13422838)
I have occasionally remarked, you can't gain more weight than the weight of the food you eat, because conservation of mass. This is sometimes my response to people who don't eat a single donut on a special occasion. Naturally the pound or less of food you might eat in a day is not permanently conserved. I also think that a pound of food sounds like an enormous amount, but it really isn't. If you like hamburgers (and let's say you make your own so they are wholesome) you might cook a third of a pound of ground meat to make one.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Closed-loop body weight control
by belovedeagle on Wednesday January 18, 2017 @06:25PM
(#13431485)
> you can't gain more weight than the weight of the food you eat, because conservation of mass
Not, strictly speaking, true: not only must we consider mass-energy equivalence (the chemicals bonds in food vs metabolic byproducts could contribute unequally to mass), but more importantly, we inhale mass well as ingest. From the article, one mass-unit of inhaled oxygen produces less than one unit of exhaled carbon dioxide (although I suspect that more than enough water is lost though net exhalation alone to make up for it). So we have to be a little careful with this conservation of mass argument. It's still basically correct, though, and more-or-less blows the "weight gain is exactly proportional to excess calories" argument out of the water.
Re:Closed-loop body weight control
by leephillips on Tuesday January 17, 2017 @10:23PM
(#13423714)
In fact, the implicit basis behind the method described in the article is exactly conservation of mass.