News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Show HN: ChatSecure iOS v4.0 – OMEMO and Signal Protocol by ge0rg on Tuesday January 17, 2017 @05:43PM (#13422198)
Congratulations! It's nice to see that we now have both Android (https:/mconversations.im) and iOS covered by usable and secure XMPP clients!
Re:Show HN: ChatSecure iOS v4.0 – OMEMO and Signal Protocol by ge0rg on Wednesday January 18, 2017 @12:45PM (#13428412)
The correct URL is of course https://conversations.im
Re:Show HN: ChatSecure iOS v4.0 – OMEMO and Signal Protocol by gtirloni on Tuesday January 17, 2017 @08:35PM (#13423291)
The list of features at conversations.im is impressive. Despite the fact that nobody I know is using it, I wanted to have a quick look but it's a paid app (I know, GPL, etc). And one I know I won't be actively using. There is too much friction to try it out.
Re:Show HN: ChatSecure iOS v4.0 – OMEMO and Signal Protocol by erlehmann_ on Tuesday January 17, 2017 @08:55PM (#13423383)
One can get Conversations from the F-Droid store without spending money: https://f-droid.org/
Re:Show HN: ChatSecure iOS v4.0 – OMEMO and Signal Protocol by openplatypus on Wednesday January 18, 2017 @04:48AM (#13425212)
Then you can support project but paying for really reliable service and for few extra € you can even use your own domain.
Re:Show HN: ChatSecure iOS v4.0 – OMEMO and Signal Protocol by BuuQu9hu on Wednesday January 18, 2017 @02:08AM (#13424668)
Asking for money in return for binaries of GPL/FLOSS apps uploaded to the app stores of proprietary platforms seems like a decent way to fund FLOSS development. Folks there are used to paying anyway. Folks interested in FLOSS will be using platforms like Cydia, F-Droid or Debian/Fedora anyway.
Re:Show HN: ChatSecure iOS v4.0 – OMEMO and Signal Protocol by gtirloni on Wednesday January 18, 2017 @07:52AM (#13425961)
I'm not arguing about the validity of the method that was chosen. I agree it's a valid method.

What I'm saying is that, if the goal is widespread usage, there are little small roadblocks before users can actually be using the app.

I cannot ask my family and friends to install F-droid or pay for an app that I'm not even sure they will like. So realistically, I will never mention it to them.

Maybe I misunderstood what is the target audience from the beginning. You're telling me it is the 0.0001℅ of the population that uses 3rd-party app stores, Linux, etc. That's fine too but it comes with its own limitations.