News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The fivethirtyeight R package by gfosco on Tuesday January 17, 2017 @05:15PM (#13421956)
You don't get to redefine fake news. I'm a huge fan of real journalism, and the ethics and integrity behind it. When journalists fail those ethics and report things they haven't vetted, that is not news, it's fake news.
Re:The fivethirtyeight R package by ivraatiems on Tuesday January 17, 2017 @05:25PM (#13422047)
Sorry, no, your definition is the one that's wrong.[1]

[1]https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fake_news_website (links to numerous examples of proper usage)

Re:The fivethirtyeight R package by gfosco on Tuesday January 17, 2017 @05:56PM (#13422292)
"Fake news website" !== "Fake news" and Wikipedia is not the arbiter of all truth either.
Re:The fivethirtyeight R package by lukejduncan on Wednesday January 18, 2017 @02:02AM (#13424642)
Nope, definitely your definition that's wrong. One of many examples http://pca.st/VnJY