Re:The fivethirtyeight R package
by gfosco on Tuesday January 17, 2017 @05:15PM
(#13421956)
You don't get to redefine fake news. I'm a huge fan of real journalism, and the ethics and integrity behind it. When journalists fail those ethics and report things they haven't vetted, that is not news, it's fake news.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The fivethirtyeight R package
by ivraatiems on Tuesday January 17, 2017 @05:25PM
(#13422047)
Sorry, no, your definition is the one that's wrong.[1]
[1]https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fake_news_website (links to numerous examples of proper usage)
"Fake news website" !== "Fake news" and Wikipedia is not the arbiter of all truth either.
Re:The fivethirtyeight R package
by lukejduncan on Wednesday January 18, 2017 @02:02AM
(#13424642)
Nope, definitely your definition that's wrong. One of many examples http://pca.st/VnJY