Authoritarians Distract Rather Than Debate

Re:Authoritarians Distract Rather Than Debate by Chickenality on Tuesday January 17, 2017 @11:44AM (#13418939)

One major difference is how concentrated the special interests are. In the case of the Chinese government, public opinion is being swayed by a single entity. In the US, a large number of interest groups are all competing to try to sway public opinion. In the latter case, I think it's harder (at least in principle) for any one group to have a large effect on its own.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Authoritarians Distract Rather Than Debate by JulianMorrison on Tuesday January 17, 2017 @11:56AM (#13419044)

Except, centralization of wealth means that the opinions of a relatively few people control the seeming surface diversity of "influencers" in the USA by holding the purse strings (when the proles resort to crowd funding they can break out of this to an extent, Bernie being an example).

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Authoritarians Distract Rather Than Debate by stcredzero on Tuesday January 17, 2017 @02:53PM (#13420570)

The elites rig the elections and the public sphere, while the proles use the one election where they can still sway the vote to vote for dangerous populists as a protest.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=trrqslUpfdw

Old republican values are relegated to the dustbin, and a civilization becomes a shadow of its former self. This has happened before, and will happen again.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Authoritarians Distract Rather Than Debate by tikhonj on Tuesday January 17, 2017 @12:16PM (#13419193)

This seems to play out in practice—in the US, the issues that have the most lobbying and airplay tend to have strong voices on both sides. Sometimes it's companies on one side and activist groups on the other, but often it's a mix of different activists and companies on both sides. They're not always matched evenly, but few things are entirely one-sided.

The really scary lobbying is the sort that stays out of the public opinion and tries to influence the government in niche areas the average person doesn't know or care about (like very specific industry regulations). That's where companies get away with the most egregious things, at least until something finally brings the issue to the public conscience.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Authoritarians Distract Rather Than Debate by ConfuciusSay02 on Tuesday January 17, 2017 @12:44PM (#13419455)

Totally disagree, in the US as in China there is a ruling wealthy elite. Both are roughly the same proportion of the population, and both are pushing their agendas.

The one meaningful difference is that in the US they still pay lip service to the idea of free speech.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Authoritarians Distract Rather Than Debate by danharaj on Tuesday January 17, 2017 @11:47AM (#13418972)

Except in the common intersection of their interests.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Authoritarians Distract Rather Than Debate by notahacker on Tuesday January 17, 2017 @12:20PM (#13419231)

The other major differences is that political cultures that place high value on free expression of political views and public political participation generally don't have to bother paying people to reason, brigade or troll for their preferred political cause

[ Parent | on HN ]