News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Webpack 2, RC 7. Parent comment

Re:Webpack 2, RC 7 by sametmax on Monday January 16, 2017 @03:21PM (#13412682)
I still wonder how come the first syntax was considered a good idea in the first place ?

Figuring how to configure webpack 1 (haven't tried 2) is crazy, and I don't understand how people able to construct such a complex tool that is currently unique on the market, and works so well, managed to design a conf settings that badly.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Webpack 2, RC 7 by dictum on Monday January 16, 2017 @03:53PM (#13412904)
> I still wonder how come the first syntax was considered a good idea in the first place ?

I think it came from RequireJS, probably intended for one-off usage (e.g. a single require that requires a certain loader)

Still a bad idea, though.

http://requirejs.org/docs/plugins.html (Jan 2011: https://web.archive.org/web/20110109084245/http://requirejs....)

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Webpack 2, RC 7 by thelarkinn on Monday January 16, 2017 @03:55PM (#13412923)
Ironically the biggest challenge is involved with connecting a very declarative under the hood plugin architecture, to a more imperitive fluid configuration for users. We would love all the great ideas we can get!
[ Parent | on HN ]