Re:Battery with inbuilt 'fire extinguisher' developed
by philipkglass on Monday January 16, 2017 @04:19PM
(#13413129)
Halogenated fire retardants are some of the worst persistent organic pollutants, so like you I looked up triphenyl phosphate to see if it's likely to become a problem in its own right. It looks pretty safe to me when you consider all factors.
In active batteries triphenyl phosphate remains separated from humans. In proper recycling processes it remains separated from humans. In improperly landfilled batteries it can escape containment, but it has negligible vapor pressure at ambient temperatures so it won't spread by air. It rapidly biodegrades in the presence of water so it won't lead to human exposure through waterways or groundwater plumes if a landfill leaks.
It only makes sense when a large battery serves as a power store for something like a vehicle, where a fire extinguisher stands between a cabin full of concussions and a cabin full of charred corpses.
Cell phones are sold to us as disposable trash, that corporations and governments use to eavesdrop on our lives. We're trained to sneer at a cell phone more than a year old.
From Wikipedia:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triphenyl_phosphateThere aren't a lot of teeth to regulations for responsible battery disposal. Even in countries with healthy recycling programs. If I threw all my old cell phone batteries into landfill today, I could safely gamble with any punishment risked.
Now add unspent fire suppressant to the list of things that go in the garbage with last year's cell phone?