Re:Stop Paying Executives for Performance (2016)
by sokoloff on Sunday January 15, 2017 @10:13AM
(#13404308)
>So you want to pay executives but not based on how THEY actually did as individuals, but on a group basis?
>That is a truly innovative bonus system. Excuse the sarcasm, you invited it.
Yes, that is exactly what I want to do. As a customer, shareholder, or employee, I don't care if it was Bill the COO's execution or Jane the CEO's vision and strategy caused the company to succeed; I care the company succeeded.
It is "all for one and one for all".
> In case you meant something else than me, you replied to my comment that was a reply to one very specific comment, and I obviously assume we are still on that topic.
Your text was clear that it was "individual person's actions". I did not misread that as "what they had for lunch on a random Tuesday".
I'm sorry that you are frustrated by "exactly these kinds of ridiculous misinterpretations" in this thread. I don't think they are with the person you think though.
>That is a truly innovative bonus system. Excuse the sarcasm, you invited it.
Yes, that is exactly what I want to do. As a customer, shareholder, or employee, I don't care if it was Bill the COO's execution or Jane the CEO's vision and strategy caused the company to succeed; I care the company succeeded.
It is "all for one and one for all".
> In case you meant something else than me, you replied to my comment that was a reply to one very specific comment, and I obviously assume we are still on that topic.
I also assumed that. We adopted a similarly structured program as edblarney contemplated, summarized here: http://ir.cimpress.com/mobile.view?c=188894&v=202&d=3&id=aHR...
Your text was clear that it was "individual person's actions". I did not misread that as "what they had for lunch on a random Tuesday".
I'm sorry that you are frustrated by "exactly these kinds of ridiculous misinterpretations" in this thread. I don't think they are with the person you think though.