News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:There is no WhatsApp 'backdoor' by jMyles on Friday January 13, 2017 @05:32PM (#13395382)
You mean someone publishing source code and then falsely verifying the binary checksum?

I mean, at the end of the day, it's very easy to verify - if the binary doesn't match what whomever gets when they compile, there better be a reason for it.

Regardless, I don't think this is the biggest problem facing open source.

Re:There is no WhatsApp 'backdoor' by Groxx on Friday January 13, 2017 @05:48PM (#13395493)
>if the binary doesn't match what whomever gets when they compile, there better be a reason for it.

True, but deterministic compiles are stupendously difficult in most cases. Which is improving slowly, but still isn't usually an option.

Re:There is no WhatsApp 'backdoor' by BuuQu9hu on Saturday January 14, 2017 @02:27AM (#13397366)
Debian is up to 92% deterministic builds, so not that hard:

https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/reproducible.ht...

Re:There is no WhatsApp 'backdoor' by Groxx on Saturday January 14, 2017 @03:54PM (#13400498)
Ooh, that is a heck of a lot better than the last time I looked at it. And a very neat link - thanks!