News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Affordable Care by fooey on Friday January 13, 2017 @03:03PM (#13394226)
If car insurance had to cover a 6+ figure operation replacing an old engine that was was seized up because of poor maintenance, it would make financial sense to cover oil changes as a preventative measure.

A health disaster is several orders of magnitude more expensive than an automotive disaster, and you can't just total out a human being and pick up a new one at the local dealership if it's too expensive.

Preventative maintenance is a money saver long term.

Re:Affordable Care by pravda on Friday January 13, 2017 @07:41PM (#13396064)
"Annual physicals" in asymptomatic individuals are known to be a useless waste of money and time.

https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/re-thinking-the-annual-phys...

Re:Affordable Care by gleb on Saturday January 14, 2017 @01:00AM (#13397153)
By that logic car insurance would cover brake service.
Re:Affordable Care by drodgers on Saturday January 14, 2017 @01:42AM (#13397255)
Human error causes >90% of car crashes (https://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/blog/2013/12/human-error-cause...), so brake maintenance is a very inefficient way to reduce insurance risk. Instead, insurers penalise people based on their history of crashes (or — more importantly to the insurers — claims). The market is actually working well in that case.