Re:Obama Expands Surveillance Powers on His Way Out
by maxerickson on Friday January 13, 2017 @09:55AM
(#13391210)
None of that means that it isn't worth showing up to vote against an obviously terrible local candidate.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Obama Expands Surveillance Powers on His Way Out
by mindslight on Friday January 13, 2017 @01:10PM
(#13393017)
I'm not aware of any elections where you can "vote against" a candidate.
Re:Obama Expands Surveillance Powers on His Way Out
by maxerickson on Friday January 13, 2017 @01:20PM
(#13393109)
A semantician strikes again!
If you are actually confused about my meaning I'd be glad to explain further.
Re:Obama Expands Surveillance Powers on His Way Out
by mindslight on Friday January 13, 2017 @01:25PM
(#13393166)
I'm not confused about your meaning, but disputing such characterization of the situation. A vote for a candidate is a vote for that candidate, an endorsement of their subsequent actions. Don't get tricked by subjectively slightly "less worse" candidates.