News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The illustrated guide to a Ph.D. (2010) by tom_mellior on Thursday January 12, 2017 @10:27AM (#13382908)
> and now (it probably has been updated) the reposter is respecting the terms of it

The reposter still doesn't link back to the actual article as requested, though that's just a "please" clause. I guess naming (and even linking) the author and giving the title suffices to satisfy the attribution clause of the license.

Re:The illustrated guide to a Ph.D. (2010) by StreakyCobra on Thursday January 12, 2017 @10:35AM (#13382993)
> The reposter still doesn't link back to the actual article as requested, though that's just a "please" clause. I guess naming (and even linking) the author and giving the title suffices to satisfy the attribution clause of the license.

Indeed, I thought there was a link to the blog post, but there is not any. The situation is different than before though, as the real author is now at least credited.