Re:Obama is seriously considering a pardon for Chelsea Manning
by totalZero on Wednesday January 11, 2017 @10:13PM
(#13379571)
The US wasn't founded to serve as a beacon of prestige. The point of the government has more to do with its obligations to, and relationship with, its people.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Obama is seriously considering a pardon for Chelsea Manning
by ionised on Thursday January 12, 2017 @07:24AM
(#13381681)
> The US wasn't founded to serve as a beacon of prestige. The point of the government has more to do with its obligations to, and relationship with, its people.
Its rich people.
Re:Obama is seriously considering a pardon for Chelsea Manning
by totalZero on Saturday January 14, 2017 @10:49AM
(#13398896)
Some comments go "zing!" without going "aha!"
Re:Obama is seriously considering a pardon for Chelsea Manning
by frozenport on Wednesday January 11, 2017 @11:40PM
(#13379870)
But I don't see anything in the documents that showed a government working against its own people. The content of the documents is mostly matter-of-fact (or even sarcastic) analysis of other countries. In a few cases it reveled intelligence sources, for example Lebanese politicians politicians working against the destructive foreign influence in their country - more controversially, I think, there was a US "spy" in the German government. I'm not German, so I have no problem with this. In other cases, for example in South Sudan, it shows the US government working, perhaps clandestinely, to uphold justice and help the people avoid ethnic cleansing.