Re:
by cderwin on Wednesday January 11, 2017 @06:47PM
(#13378566)
He can be entirely and uniformly contrarian throughout his entire life without being contrarian for the sake of being contrarian. We have no idea beyond wild guesses why he is contrarian.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:
by dragonwriter on Wednesday January 11, 2017 @06:50PM
(#13378597)
Being contrarian is being contrary for the sake of being contrary.
Not according to the dictionary (maybe some, but it's clearly not a consensus): http://www.dictionary.com/browse/contrarian