Re:Is Justin Timberlake a Product of Cumulative Advantage?
by dhbradshaw on Monday April 16, 2007 @02:59PM
(#13359)
I think this model implies a certain marketing strategy. While achieving a critical mass might be impossible (read unlikely and hard to control) if you try for the world as a whole, it may be possible for a smaller one. Once you have a small group that is largely converted you can add other groups in such a way that you don't put out the fire by separating members of the first group.
It may be that a large part of the success of Facebook comes from the way they were able to use student bodies as small, self-contained networks, and then build from there.
It reminds me of building a fire with charcoals. If you keep them together you can keep them burning. If you can get a nice group going you can add to it bit by bit and build as big as you want. If you disperse them they die.
Our world has a million little self-contained networks. If you try to win some over perhaps some will succeed to the point that the network works for you. Then maybe you can add others.
It may be that a large part of the success of Facebook comes from the way they were able to use student bodies as small, self-contained networks, and then build from there.
It reminds me of building a fire with charcoals. If you keep them together you can keep them burning. If you can get a nice group going you can add to it bit by bit and build as big as you want. If you disperse them they die.
Our world has a million little self-contained networks. If you try to win some over perhaps some will succeed to the point that the network works for you. Then maybe you can add others.