Add a const here, delete a const there

Re:Add a const here, delete a const there by obl on Monday January 09, 2017 @01:00PM (#13358229)

Would appreciate a reference on that if you have it handy.

Is this more of a whole program measured X% regression on some perf benchs, or specific target cases where the codegen is notably worse ?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Add a const here, delete a const there by brucedawson on Monday January 09, 2017 @08:49PM (#13361844)

I should probably take back my claim because I can't find the evidence to back it up and I might actually be wrong. I thought I remembered that there were some important cases where VC++ generated better code for Chrome, and some binary size advantages, but I can't find my references.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Add a const here, delete a const there by brucedawson on Friday January 13, 2017 @08:59PM (#13396380)

crbug.com/457078 talks about binary size in clang-cl versus VC++. On x86 builds clang-cl produces ~14% larger binaries. On x64 builds it produces ~3.5% smaller binaries.

My recent changes have made the comparison tougher for clang-cl by making the VC++ binaries smaller :-)

[ Parent | on HN ]