News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Get Ready For C# 4.0 by jacquesm on Monday May 10, 2010 @02:00PM (#1335365)
Yes, but your own counter argument is based on a feeling, that's not much more solid than what Ricardo said to begin with, it is also unsupported, or at best anecdotal.

None of this based on objective facts or stuff that you could measure. His truth to me is as good as your truth.

But he got modded in to the ground and you got modded up.

Re:Get Ready For C# 4.0 by mquander on Monday May 10, 2010 @02:13PM (#1335423)
I know. I didn't intend mine as a counter-argument, but just as background for why I felt it was flamebait -- I have experience that indicates to me it's not credible to just uncategorically state that one is "far better." Like I expressed, it doesn't seem like there was much of an argument to make a counter-argument to.

I wouldn't have modded me up, either; in fact, I would have modded me down, because this whole discussion is off-topic and doesn't deserve attention. I think the majority of moderation on here seems awful and is rarely even vaguely proportional to the quality of the comments, and I agree that this is an example of awful moderation. So you're arguing with the wrong fellow.

EDIT: I amended my comment above to be irritating and sarcastic toward people who modded me up.

Re:Get Ready For C# 4.0 by jacquesm on Monday May 10, 2010 @03:51PM (#1335720)
> EDIT: I amended my comment above to be irritating and sarcastic toward people who modded me up.

Classy! My email is in my profile by the way, in case you ever want to take something 'offline'.