Re:Why read old philosophy?
by glenstein on Sunday January 08, 2017 @07:18PM
(#13353040)
>that there exist empirical truths in the fields of ethics and metaphysics, the latter of which is not scientifically testable by definition.
This is a digression off the main subject, but at least with respect to ethics I think that's a pretty bold claim. Ethical naturalism is a perfectly mainstream school of thought, and they don't share this definition of ethics.
This is a digression off the main subject, but at least with respect to ethics I think that's a pretty bold claim. Ethical naturalism is a perfectly mainstream school of thought, and they don't share this definition of ethics.