News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:What If Time Really Exists? (2008) by sigmaml on Saturday January 07, 2017 @09:00AM (#13344157)
But, limiting debates to the observable, testable (falsifiable) and repeatable subset has helped us improve our understanding of the nature of physical reality.

Wouldn't you agree?

Re:What If Time Really Exists? (2008) by jschwartzi on Saturday January 07, 2017 @10:00AM (#13344400)
But it's not very helpful in understanding the nature of ourselves, which is where science remains a weak tool.
Re:What If Time Really Exists? (2008) by naasking on Saturday January 07, 2017 @11:05AM (#13344750)
It's a mistake to conclude science is a weak tool just because it produces less certain results in the social sciences. "Weak" is a relative measure, so science is only a weak tool if you can actually demonstrate the existence of a much better tool.
Re:What If Time Really Exists? (2008) by pluma on Saturday January 07, 2017 @11:04AM (#13344746)
It may be a weak tool, but it's the only tool that we know actually works.

Also, as science helps us advance technology it becomes a continuously stronger tool.