News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Visiting a site that uses Disqus when not logged in sends... by maglavaitss on Friday January 06, 2017 @03:49PM (#13340056)
My two cents:

1. All local. Unless you don't want and a 100-200kb JS file is too much of a strain on your server bandwidth. Or are you serving 15Mb of JS files?

2. Screw Disqus. Screw Facebook Comments. Start thinking about your visitors, as someone said on another related thread, you are responsible for the tracking of your visitors by 3rd-party sites. Local comments or turn them off if you don't care about what others are saying. Don't save any information about the commenters except what they enter in the boxes. One-way hash the IPs if you need to compare for spam reasons.

3. If you need your ego stroked when you see you had xx visitors on your site, go ahead, use Google Analytics and screw us all. We're gonna block it anyway.

[1] This is a privacy policy I use and respect very much when interacting with the visitors/commenters on my personal blog.

1. https://vox.space/pages/106/privacy-policy

Re:Visiting a site that uses Disqus when not logged in sends... by d2p on Friday January 06, 2017 @04:09PM (#13340217)
> 3. If you need your ego stroked when you see you had xx visitors on your site

That's a bit harsh - wanting to know whether you get 0 visitors to your blog post or 2,000 yesterday isn't just about ego; it helps you understand the value of your posts (and whether you should bother). Knowing how many people visited isn't the same as bragging about it.

Re:Visiting a site that uses Disqus when not logged in sends... by petre on Saturday January 07, 2017 @02:52AM (#13342907)
Just use the web server logs and crunch them into a log analyzer.
Re:Visiting a site that uses Disqus when not logged in sends... by d2p on Saturday January 07, 2017 @03:47AM (#13343062)
My blog is hosted on GitHub Pages; I don't have access to web server logs.
Re:Visiting a site that uses Disqus when not logged in sends... by maglavaitss on Friday January 06, 2017 @04:15PM (#13340268)
Maybe it was harsh, the idea is: You might write better when you don't know how many people read your articles. On the other hand, you might write better when you know. Plan accordingly :)
Re:Visiting a site that uses Disqus when not logged in sends... by d2p on Friday January 06, 2017 @04:30PM (#13340379)
Maybe you do, but it's not outrageous to want to know. If my posts are getting 0 visitors, I'd rather know and spend the time on something else!
Re:Visiting a site that uses Disqus when not logged in sends... by GrinningFool on Friday January 06, 2017 @04:08PM (#13340213)
2. I need to look into self-hosted comments; but I was hoping to make the blog portion of the site static to keep it simpler. Project pages may have demos/etc that pull in JS libraries. But you raise a good point in 1 that also applies to 2 - given that I'm probably going to be reaching only a handful of people initially (and perhaps longer), worrying about bandwidth is a premature optimization.

3. I've just about talking myself into going with log-based analytics here. I find ga's omnipresence too worrisome to contribute to it, even with consent.

Thanks for that link, that's essentially the policy in my head before I started thinking about things like comment support. It's way better written than I would've come up with.

Re:Visiting a site that uses Disqus when not logged in sends... by mmatants on Friday January 06, 2017 @05:24PM (#13340867)
Re #2: - patio11 recently fired off a few tweets about doing away with comments on his blog: https://twitter.com/patio11/status/813895918692876289

Can't say I would disagree. A lot of folks these days just seem to append an HN/Reddit link to posts that get discussions on those sites. There's the blog as an expression of author's personality, and then there's the discussion space as an area with a life of its own.