> So I ask again? Why benefit is Apple gaining keeping him on?
Who says they aren't, or won't? This is what is publicly seen as a slap on the wrist.
It is a smart way to perform damage control. It is basically saying to the criticism towards Apple [from both shareholders as well as users]: "we know, we screwed up, you are right" without going into detail on who or what is exactly right.
Don't forget all the criticism towards MBP 2016.
> So I ask again? Why benefit is Apple gaining keeping him on?
Who says they aren't, or won't? This is what is publicly seen as a slap on the wrist.
It is a smart way to perform damage control. It is basically saying to the criticism towards Apple [from both shareholders as well as users]: "we know, we screwed up, you are right" without going into detail on who or what is exactly right.