Re:Use "App folder" access type instead of "Full Dropbox"
by nipunn1313 on Friday January 06, 2017 @01:19PM
(#13338698)
This is not an all or nothing issue. For example, if you store sensitive videos, but rely on Dropbox's ability to transcode and preview the video in a web browser, then something like Cryptomater would not make sense. Encrypting on wire/at rest is the best you can do unless you run the transcoding yourself.
Dropbox could support both modes, but the company has obviously made a decision to prioritize one over the other (at least for now).
Re:Use "App folder" access type instead of "Full Dropbox"
by mcgrath_sh on Friday January 06, 2017 @01:04PM
(#13338545)
I second Cryptomator. I used it to make an encrypted "File Cabinet" for important documents that I want on Dropbox.
It is so simple, I actually used to it show my mom show to set up an encrypted folder on a flash drive of important information she wanted to store in a safety deposit box.
For alternatives to the popular cloud services for the privacy conscious, there's a good list of open source projects and products on https://www.privacytools.io