News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Heath and Fillekes v. Google Inc. Lawsuit. Parent comment

Re:Heath and Fillekes v. Google Inc. Lawsuit by gohrt on Thursday January 05, 2017 @07:11PM (#13332726)
The committee is how you "pass" the interview. Only awful interview performances are rejected on interview scores alone, before committee. Committee reduces the set of interview scores into a single decision.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Heath and Fillekes v. Google Inc. Lawsuit by jedmeyers on Monday January 09, 2017 @12:21AM (#13354203)
That's actually the reason I got confused with the original comment I replied to. The author said he 'passed' the interview and then got rejected by committee, and the only committee 'after' passing the interview is the VP/SVP review. In reality he did not actually passed the interview, he might have just gotten a relatively good feedback from the interviewers.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Heath and Fillekes v. Google Inc. Lawsuit by howawaygoog on Thursday January 05, 2017 @11:11PM (#13333863)
recruiter literally emailed me "congratulations, you passed the interviews", before committee so that's very confusing, what did I pass then, a low filter?
[ Parent | on HN ]