News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on I've removed all ad network code from my blog. Parent comment

Re:I've removed all ad network code from my blog by jameskegel on Thursday January 05, 2017 @10:21AM (#13327742)
Thank you for taking a moment to respond; if I can get another question in, can you tell me a bit about how this scales with, say 10 or 40 images on a page as far as filesize goes? 150k in the context of modern web pages is not too far off from being realistic as an ad solution, depending on how many pictures it takes to reach the tipping point of page load time.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:I've removed all ad network code from my blog by bazillion on Thursday January 05, 2017 @10:40AM (#13327951)
I have a test page that does 1000 images with 2-4 PLEENQs on each image, and performance is good with an 8-gig of ram mac mini and an iPhone 5 (my test platform for the mobile version).

I do about 10 million impressions a day, and the request to the server is a pretty consistent ~200ms, along with an async load that won't affect overall page load.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:I've removed all ad network code from my blog by jameskegel on Thursday January 05, 2017 @10:57AM (#13328117)
That's not exactly answering the question I was asking, regarding file size.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:I've removed all ad network code from my blog by bazillion on Thursday January 05, 2017 @11:07AM (#13328224)
Oh, I read that as performance on the page for some reason. File size is exactly the same regardless of how many images/PLEENQs.
[ Parent | on HN ]