Re:Renewing Medium’s focus
by tonystubblebine on Wednesday January 04, 2017 @04:32PM
(#13322253)
Thanks! Yeah, a lot of the new Ringer stuff has been great. The Simmons model of content written by true fans is a great model. The low quality version of that doesn't work. But they seem to have figured it out and new posts have been much higher quality.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
One thing that Simmons has never figured out is that just because someone shares your interest for football doesn't mean they share your interest for mafia movies.
Instead of making 1 site (or 1 show) that is a grab-bag of various things-that-Bill-Simmons-likes, why not have several niche sites that cover different topics?
I can't read The Ringer because I don't want to get movie reviews from the same place I get NBA game breakdowns.
Also, the ratio of joke articles to serious articles is all wrong. It should be 1 joke article for every 10 serious articles, at least.
Re:Renewing Medium’s focus
by Doctor_Fegg on Wednesday January 04, 2017 @06:03PM
(#13322958)
Slight tangent, but this is why I stopped reading The Verge. Their editorial product went from tech to tech + sci-fi + American pop music + cars. Which I guess is great for a large subset of their readers, but alienates those of us who read contemporary fiction, listen to classical music, and ride bikes.
(By contrast, the one print newspaper I still buy, the (UK) Observer, does all of the above and more.)
I think this is interesting because I actually am fascinated by a great writer like Simmons, who is one of the last honest sportswriters. I'm curious about his other tastes because I view him as an authentic cultural critic. But I do wonder if I'm in the minority or you are with that opinion! Good comment.
I see Simmons as a fan with a platform. That's what I like about him, he's unabashedly a fan. I don't mind when he makes references to pop culture and other things he likes, but I mostly read/listen to him for his take on sports.
So when some other person writes on his website that "SoundCloud Comments Are the Only Good Comments", I just don't care about that. At all.
Do you think the problem is the site navigation? I subscribe to a couple of newspapers and it doesn't bother me at all that I get both movie reviews and financial news from something like the NY Times. I generally have found this to be true with the Ringer as well. The fact that I found a movie review to be insightful drives me to read more of the sports coverage because it carries a similar expectation of quality.
Yes, navigation is a big part of it. Currently for sports the nav lists NFL and NBA. That's all. I know the site covers more sports than that, I've read the articles. There's a college basketball podcast, an MLB podcast. But there's no "Baseball" section to the website.
Fixing the nav would help but it wouldn't be enough if 50% of articles are humorous.