Re:Ask HN: What current companies have the best software eng...
by ma2rten on Wednesday January 04, 2017 @05:39PM
(#13322790)
It's committee of people from all over the company that don't know the person in question. The candidate prepares a document that shows their contributions with some quantifiable metrics.
There has been research that showed that this kind of decision process decreases bias.
How on earth does this follow? I know that peer review is in fashion right now, but without some very strong context, this seems more like a recipe for a Keynesian beauty contest than a useful measure of merit.