Re:Getting Past C
by jstimpfle on Tuesday January 03, 2017 @06:15PM
(#13314197)
When opting for a DSL that compiles to low-level the "Haskell" part is less important.
I've heard the idea of DSLs over and over again, but who actually does that? I know of course of sed, awk, regex, etc but what part of NTPsec is narrow enough in scope and large enough in volume to justify creating a DSL? (just asking -- I'm not familiar with NTPsec).
I've heard the idea of DSLs over and over again, but who actually does that? I know of course of sed, awk, regex, etc but what part of NTPsec is narrow enough in scope and large enough in volume to justify creating a DSL? (just asking -- I'm not familiar with NTPsec).