News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:An Ancient City Emerges in a Remote Rain Forest by acqq on Tuesday January 03, 2017 @04:39PM (#13313369)
It doesn't work that way: if something wasn't looted recently you get the most of information not by taking a few "valuable" things but by carefully studying every small trace. This was known even much before the times if Indiana Jones. Surprise: the life is different from the dumbed-down movies. So you have to bring the whole team and some people to protect them. Everything else is a huge loss.
Re:An Ancient City Emerges in a Remote Rain Forest by OJFord on Tuesday January 03, 2017 @06:33PM (#13314320)
Agreed - as I understand it, the relative and absolute positioning of pieces, and analysis of surrounding dirt, is very often more useful information than anything that can be gleaned from the piece itself.
Re:An Ancient City Emerges in a Remote Rain Forest by 67726e on Tuesday January 03, 2017 @10:00PM (#13315320)
Back in the 9th grade we visited a dig site and we even got to dig a little with the university folks overseeing. Boy did they get mad when I found an intact pot and unceremoniously ripped it out of the ground to show off. That was just for a dirt patch on a barrier island. I can't imagine how bad ransacking a major site would be.
Re:An Ancient City Emerges in a Remote Rain Forest by foota on Tuesday January 03, 2017 @10:05PM (#13315348)
@67 perhaps you mean unceremoniously?
Re:An Ancient City Emerges in a Remote Rain Forest by 67726e on Tuesday January 03, 2017 @10:07PM (#13315356)
You're right, I've fallen victim to autocorrect.