Re:Basic Economy Fares Don't Lower Ticket Prices, They Incre...
by ericd on Tuesday January 03, 2017 @12:21PM
(#13310799)
I mainly meant to say that it's a ridiculous idea to suggest business/first class as a solution to basic needs given the absolutely insane pricing structure. Obviously reality makes it impossible for everyone to enjoy exactly the same advantages, regardless of their in-born traits.
Re:Basic Economy Fares Don't Lower Ticket Prices, They Incre...
by blowski on Tuesday January 03, 2017 @12:56PM
(#13311191)
So it depends how you define "basic needs". For me, this is a "nice-to-have" which might be skewed by my being average height and build. Those above average height, especially those who fly frequently, are more likely to consider it a basic need.
Re:Basic Economy Fares Don't Lower Ticket Prices, They Incre...
by ericd on Tuesday January 03, 2017 @01:05PM
(#13311281)
I would define the basic needs for a very tall person on a 6 hour flight to include the ability to keep their limbs within their allotted space.
Re:Basic Economy Fares Don't Lower Ticket Prices, They Incre...
by mnglkhn2 on Tuesday January 03, 2017 @12:05PM
(#13310608)
> Should a person of average height and on minimum wage subsidise a well-paid tall person?
I assume it is ok though that a short well-paid person to subsidize a tall less-paid individual?
So what happens with people of below average intelligence and physical ability? They're likely to suffer from lower earnings. Should a person of average height and on minimum wage subsidise a well-paid tall person?
In an ideal world, chairs would adjust so that everyone is comfortable and still allow the same number of people on the plane at the same price. However, in the real world, we probably have to accept that allocating comfort based on ability to pay, with a bit of flexibility on both sides, is the best outcome.