Re:Supervolcano Campi Flegrei Stirs Under Naples Italy
by JoeAltmaier on Monday January 02, 2017 @10:11AM
(#13301518)
A seven-mile caldera would surely be a 'major eruption'. Lots of distance between a small mountain (439 ft tall, isn't that a hill?) and a large volcano (Vesuvius is for instance the size of Naples).
Re:Supervolcano Campi Flegrei Stirs Under Naples Italy
by chakalakasp on Monday January 02, 2017 @03:10PM
(#13304033)
I think what he's asking is how one would know whether the entire caldera was at risk or whether there was just a risk of a small eruption, such as in the 16th century. I'm guessing the answer is that "they don't".
I'm going to assume it's 1538 AD and that this volcano has slumbered almost 500 years. And if create a "new mountain" was enough to relieve the pressure then, how do they distinguish a major eruption from a minor one when performing these forecasts?