having my email client highlight overly long sentences, duplicate words, ambiguous references (e.g. what noun does "it" refer to) and more would undoubtable save proofreading time and doesn't sounds that difficult to implement.
While it's geared a bit more for the legal field, WordRake does a good job of finding many of these mistakes. It works as an Add-in for Word or Outlook. It's good for finding instances where you use 5 words when 2 would have been better. It will analyze a chunk of text, find clunky chunks, and give a suggestion which you can accept or reject. I find even if the suggestion isn't a good one, it's a bad sentence which needs to be reworked.Because the intent of a sentence is not always known, there is no Accept All button.
Disclaimer: I have received a free year license, but not in exchange for writing this.
Not very long ago I posted a Ask HN about this:
Re:Shell scripts to improve your writing
by walterbell on Sunday January 01, 2017 @02:18PM
(#13296836)
online grammar checkers: http://nybookeditors.com/2016/02/instantly-improve-your-writ...
offline grammar checkers: https://www.serenity-software.com & http://www.editorsoftware.com/StyleWriter.html
See Draft for markdown based editing w/the 'writing improver' - www.draftin.com
Re:Shell scripts to improve your writing
by confounded on Monday January 02, 2017 @04:35PM
(#13304752)
VC funded browser extension: https://www.grammarly.com/
We've had spellcheckers for decades but I find it really surprising that automated grammar and proofreading checkers aren't in common use yet. For example, having my email client highlight overly long sentences, duplicate words, ambiguous references (e.g. what noun does "it" refer to) and more would undoubtable save proofreading time and doesn't sounds that difficult to implement. I see online comments every few days of someone pointing out the word loose/lose is used incorrectly for instance.
I recall that many grammar checkers suffer from false positives though but has the technology not advanced?