Re:Technical report on DNC hack [pdf]
by lern_too_spel on Saturday December 31, 2016 @11:48AM
(#13291773)
I haven't missed that at all. It just has absolutely nothing to do with fleitz's claim that the DNC rigged the primaries.
Maybe you are not an American. Do you know what the primaries are?
Re:Technical report on DNC hack [pdf]
by jessaustin on Saturday December 31, 2016 @06:12PM
(#13293706)
Does the definition of "rig" change from the primaries to the general?
Re:Technical report on DNC hack [pdf]
by lern_too_spel on Sunday January 01, 2017 @11:07AM
(#13296120)
We were discussing fleitz's claim that the DNC rigged the primaries for Clinton. I assert that they didn't. I'm still not sure what you're claiming or whom you think you are disagreeing with.
One might note that this author stops short of saying rather than merely insinuating that "publishing emails" constitutes "rigging an election", but he sure wrote a lot of words in that effort.
[0] http://www.cnbc.com/2016/12/29/russia-election-hack-obama-re...