News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Economists versus the Economy by spangry on Friday December 30, 2016 @12:47AM (#13282796)
Well, after arguing that it's impractical to run RCTs I guess it's time for a bit of a 'climb-down', because this is a really great idea. I could definitely see this working in a place like the USA, where you have lots of big States with diverging political views.

I wonder what would be the best way to implement something like this? Just spitballing, but what about Federal grants to partially fund the 'treatment' States (with non-participating States acting as controls), with the policy issue and various 'treatments' negotiated between the Fed and State level? And then after that, States sign on using a mechanism similar to California proposition voting during State elections maybe?

Or maybe even push it down to a local government level? I seem to remember somewhere in the US conducting trials of basic income around the 50s or 60s. Maybe there's a model there...

Re:Economists versus the Economy by webmaven on Friday December 30, 2016 @03:22AM (#13283238)
> lots of big States with diverging political views.

The thing is, political views don't diverge quite as much as it is being made to seem. Gerrymandering scrambles the signal[0] quite a bit and the Electoral College then magnifies[1] the apparent differences.

[0] http://theweek.com/speedreads/541955/howgerrymandering-works...

[1] http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mejn/election/2016/