News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Technical report on DNC hack [pdf] by xapata on Thursday December 29, 2016 @08:05PM (#13281704)
That some people are unfamiliar with computer security is not news. I have known a fair number of big-shot executives and politicians, all of whom I'd expect would click on suspicious links in their email (if they read the email) and double-click on attachments.

The news is why that particular person was targeted.

Re:Technical report on DNC hack [pdf] by Natsu on Friday December 30, 2016 @01:00AM (#13282844)
> The news is why that particular person was targeted.

For which no proof is being presented. Lots of stuff about hacking tools, nothing really about identifying hackers. Lots of anonymous high level sources offering vague assurances and excuses for why we can't present info...

Re:Technical report on DNC hack [pdf] by xapata on Tuesday January 03, 2017 @03:09PM (#13312576)
I can think of two general possibilities. Either (1) there is a conspiracy to mislead the public or (2) showing the proof would reduce our security in some way. I find the latter explanation more plausible.