Re:Technical report on DNC hack [pdf]
by burkaman on Thursday December 29, 2016 @10:30PM
(#13282291)
What does the intelligence community have to gain by perpetrating this hack?
Re:Technical report on DNC hack [pdf]
by boomboomsubban on Friday December 30, 2016 @12:21AM
(#13282705)
Billions of dollars plus whatever power comes from picking the president and presumably having a potential deepthroat if they don't behave. And remember, the intelligence community is not unified. Even though Obama has been a huge ally of the intelligence community, not all branches got the same deal.
Ok I guess I meant specifically, is there any reason to think the intelligence community would prefer Trump? Presumably they would prefer someone who was more interested in foreign involvement, and less likely to provoke mass donations to privacy and civil rights organizations.
Re:Technical report on DNC hack [pdf]
by boomboomsubban on Monday January 09, 2017 @10:09AM
(#13356825)
Incredibly late, but I noted that the community is not unified, some of it is just about getting their candidate. Additionally, some of Trump's proposals mean a lot more cash/power for intelligence agencies, things like harsher standards on immigrants and more control over the internet.
Unless the actual perpetrators were the US intelligence community and/or the incoming administration. Then they could both hide their tracks or have no reason to unravel this. But why suspect the group with the most to gain or the community with the most experience doing this? It's not like there's any other examples of a Republican politician breaking into the DNC to tap their communications, using the intelligence agencies to help cover it up...