News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Technical report on DNC hack [pdf] by avn2109 on Thursday December 29, 2016 @07:39PM (#13281566)
True. But the absence of sophistication constitutes evidence neither in favor nor against the "State Actor" hypothesis.
Re:Technical report on DNC hack [pdf] by billions on Thursday December 29, 2016 @08:10PM (#13281734)
Until a Russian name or IP address is provided, the accusations fail to hold water. An incomplete proof is equivalent to "'cause we said so"
Re:Technical report on DNC hack [pdf] by stordoff on Friday December 30, 2016 @12:04AM (#13282642)
If you are targeting a US political entity, using a staging server in Russia probably isn't the worst idea, so unless the IP address directly ties to the Russian government/intelligence services, it's still only weak evidence of Russia's involvement.
Re:Technical report on DNC hack [pdf] by empath75 on Thursday December 29, 2016 @09:13PM (#13282004)
Spoofing ips is absurdly easy.
Re:Technical report on DNC hack [pdf] by cmdrfred on Thursday December 29, 2016 @09:32PM (#13282072)
I agree that IP addresses aren't good evidence but it isn't really possible to spoof TCP in practice.

http://security.stackexchange.com/questions/55279/how-easy-i...