News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Technical report on DNC hack [pdf] by StanislavPetrov on Thursday December 29, 2016 @06:04PM (#13280999)
>This report merely points the finger at Russia; it does not purport to substantiate that allegation.

That's the point, its just another completely baseless, unsubstantiated accusation. This report contains nothing that suggests that the Russians were any more likely to be the source of the hack then countless other entities. The problem is that these baseless claims are being presented as evidence and being consumed uncritically as such. Take for example the headline in PcMag:

>Hacking Evidence in Hand, Obama Sanctions Russia

http://www.pcmag.com/news/350675/hacking-evidence-in-hand-ob...

Re:Technical report on DNC hack [pdf] by xapata on Thursday December 29, 2016 @11:22PM (#13282495)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanislav_Petrov

Are you trying to live up to the username or using it ironically?

Re:Technical report on DNC hack [pdf] by x0x0 on Thursday December 29, 2016 @11:16PM (#13282468)
This report doesn't claim to substantiate those allegations. It merely repeats them.
Re:Technical report on DNC hack [pdf] by marxmarv on Friday December 30, 2016 @05:37AM (#13283712)
By the Big Lie theory, what's the diff?