News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Technical report on DNC hack [pdf] by naturally2014 on Thursday December 29, 2016 @04:52PM (#13280479)
I'd guess a third option, actually: It's just a best guess, but they don't like being questioned.

If they had damning evidence it'd be in their interest to release it.

Re:Technical report on DNC hack [pdf] by walshemj on Thursday December 29, 2016 @05:02PM (#13280560)
Not if it would give any humint sources away and they may have kicked out people to allow a source to step into their shoes - as the UK did to put there man in as the Resident in London
Re:Technical report on DNC hack [pdf] by porpoisemonkey on Thursday December 29, 2016 @05:19PM (#13280665)
It's somewhat obvious from the context but for anyone not familiar with military jargon I think the parent post meant to say "humint" instead of "humit" which is short hand for "human intelligence" or in layman's terms "spies".
Re:Technical report on DNC hack [pdf] by walshemj on Thursday December 29, 2016 @05:51PM (#13280907)
oops my bad