News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Technical report on DNC hack [pdf] by cylinder on Thursday December 29, 2016 @04:13PM (#13280176)
The entire thing has been a politicized distraction and propaganda campaign ... the level of discourse in America is now at a terrifying and dangerous quality; we used to mock the propaganda of the Soviets, China, etc. but we are descending into their grade.
Re:Technical report on DNC hack [pdf] by grandalf on Thursday December 29, 2016 @04:37PM (#13280350)
Exactly. Obama just created a National Anti-Propaganda Center to keep watch over American news organizations.

An elaborate surveillance/police state combined with a propaganda system is scary indeed, no matter which president or political party controls it.

Re:Technical report on DNC hack [pdf] by akhilcacharya on Thursday December 29, 2016 @05:13PM (#13280624)
>National Anti-Propaganda Center to keep watch over American news organizations.

I googled this term and all I got were conspiracy theory websites.

Here's the actual law: https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/senate-bill/327...

Re:Technical report on DNC hack [pdf] by grandalf on Thursday December 29, 2016 @10:25PM (#13282272)
Re:Technical report on DNC hack [pdf] by gipp on Thursday December 29, 2016 @04:41PM (#13280381)
State-sponsored actions intended to undermine the basis of our political institutions is a "distraction"? What qualifies as "news" by your standards?
Re:Technical report on DNC hack [pdf] by cmdrfred on Thursday December 29, 2016 @04:50PM (#13280463)
If you believe this proves that claim I have some WMD's in Iraq to sell you.
Re:Technical report on DNC hack [pdf] by gipp on Thursday December 29, 2016 @04:52PM (#13280481)
I said no such thing. Nor does the report.
Re:Technical report on DNC hack [pdf] by WalterSear on Thursday December 29, 2016 @07:26PM (#13281491)
It's not meant to be read. It's meant to be announced on television as 'proof'.