News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Facebook’s Face Recognition Tech Goes on Trial by confounded on Thursday December 29, 2016 @03:49PM (#13280004)
> ...changing the way we approach online services, but I don't see how that could be pushed through

I'm a little bit more optimistic than you. As noted in the article, there are important differences under the hood between FB in the US and The EU, and these were "pushed through" by courts, and cultural norms (e.g. not a violent/benevolent 'privacy junta' as you suggest).

I can imagine a world where the US gov banned sucking entire contact lists out of people's phones for commercial exploitation, for example. Everyone feels it's creepy, and there's zero user benefit. I don't see why this wouldn't be extremely popular, and straight forward to legislate.

This would remove the primary data collection means for FB's shadow profiles in one stroke.

Re:Facebook’s Face Recognition Tech Goes on Trial by nerdponx on Friday December 30, 2016 @09:29AM (#13284497)
How do you know there's zero user benefit? I can think of several legitimate/non-evil uses of "shadow profiles" in product research.
Re:Facebook’s Face Recognition Tech Goes on Trial by confounded on Saturday December 31, 2016 @03:22AM (#13290125)
Well, if you came home and I was wearing your partner's dressing-gown and smoking your pipe, I'm sure I could offer a few non-evil research reasons too.

What's the user benefit you have in mind?

Re:Facebook’s Face Recognition Tech Goes on Trial by nerdponx on Tuesday January 03, 2017 @12:12PM (#13310703)
Non-users represent an "unexposed" control group for experiments.
Re:Facebook’s Face Recognition Tech Goes on Trial by confounded on Wednesday January 04, 2017 @03:16AM (#13316572)
Not a user benefit (or methodologically sound).