Re:Ubuntu 16.04 Unity 8 current state [video]
by tornadoboy55 on Thursday December 29, 2016 @12:07PM
(#13278441)
X is inherently insecure. That's enough of a reason to have everything in Wayland ASAP.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Ubuntu 16.04 Unity 8 current state [video]
by bitwize on Thursday December 29, 2016 @01:37PM
(#13279069)
There's nothing inherently insecure about the X protocol. Sandboxing X would involve simply not providing information about drawables not created by the client. That means filtering out input events destined for those drawables and returning blank pixmaps when their contents are asked for.
That the X server doesn't do this, and provide knobs to control who is trusted and who isn't, is a shame. But again, we don't have to burn the entire graphics stack because security.