Re:C++17 – better than you might think
by enqk on Thursday December 29, 2016 @09:16AM
(#13277355)
> ...Yet I am not fully convinced that the general idea of language evolution implemented as ruleset outside of the language itself is the way to go.
What most people nowadays recommend programming in is actually not C++, and actually C++ + all compiler warnings, which is in itself an extension/evolution/restriction of the underlying language. So it's not so far out to go from there to externalizing more rules around valid programs.
What most people nowadays recommend programming in is actually not C++, and actually C++ + all compiler warnings, which is in itself an extension/evolution/restriction of the underlying language. So it's not so far out to go from there to externalizing more rules around valid programs.