Re:Researchers create gel that regrows tooth enamel (2015)
by threatofrain on Thursday December 29, 2016 @03:13AM
(#13276250)
For what reasons were top-end journals unwilling to publish on even just the topic, and for what reasons were researchers completely ignoring communication attempts?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Researchers create gel that regrows tooth enamel (2015)
by fractallyte on Thursday December 29, 2016 @11:41AM
(#13278274)
The articles - follow-ups on anatomic implant cases - were rejected mostly with the excuse that they didn't fall into the journal's area of interest. (I don't have access to the actual letters at the moment; I hope they're eventually published on the website.) We're talking here about top journals such as the International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery. (Not their area of interest? Seriously?!)
More worrying yet were responses from implantologists and dentists on community sites such as Dentaltown. There was a shocking level of ignorance about osseointegration and zirconia, and a belittling attitude to such a 'newfangled' treatment. (Of course, it didn't help that the CEO on our side has a very low tolerance threshold, and expresses himself with typical Austrian directness - to put it mildly...)