Re:Lessons from 3,000 technical interviews
by ryanworl on Wednesday December 28, 2016 @04:59PM
(#13274046)
Not the person who originally replied to you, but the HR class I took in college broke down the correlation of interview performance to job performance into a few finer-grained buckets than just structured and unstructured. Sorry, no sources here, as I've since gotten rid of that textbook.
Structured vs. unstructured are the fairly general categories, but that correlation number is accurate. The best predictor I can recall (~0.6 IIRC?) is a "work sample test". You can Google that and find all kinds of HR resources about it.
That is HR jargon for, in this case, writing code to solve a real problem under normal conditions for that company. That is, on an actual computer, not on a whiteboard, and not being constantly scrutinized throughout the process.
Re:Lessons from 3,000 technical interviews
by JamesBarney on Thursday December 29, 2016 @12:53AM
(#13275871)
Yeah from what I've read the two most effective predictors of employees were work-sample and GMA tests(basically IQ).
Re:Lessons from 3,000 technical interviews
by chewyshine on Wednesday December 28, 2016 @06:06PM
(#13274459)
Sure. Search for "structured interview meta-analysis validity" and you'll find a slew of the research on this topic.
Re:Lessons from 3,000 technical interviews
by JamesBarney on Thursday December 29, 2016 @12:52AM
(#13275866)
Awesome thanks!
I totally believe you, but I've been trying to find good empirical studies and authors to read on interviewing.